Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3159 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670.
Advantages of Core i5-4670
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - €48.07 vs €81.33
- Up to 36% better value when playing Forza Horizon 4 than Core i3-12100F - €0.16 vs €0.25 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 7% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Core i5-4670 - 327 vs 307 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670 - 58 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 8 vs 4 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
307
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.07
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €48.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 241 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
327
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
64%
Price, €
€81.33
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for €81.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 240 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-4670 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |