The Core i5-430M is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-12100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i5-430M
- Consumes up to 40% less energy – 35 vs 58 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i3-12100F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Core i5-430M vs Core i3-12100F
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-430M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
179
81%
Min 1% FPS
124
82%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-12100F
Jan 6th, 2022
Average FPS
221
100%
Min 1% FPS
151
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-430M vs Core i3-12100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-430M vs Core i3-12100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-430M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.267 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
2.534 GHz
59%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-12100F
Jan 6th, 2022
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-430M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-12100F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $97.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Alder Lake-S |
35 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.3 GHz |
| 3 MB | L3 Cache | 12 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
