In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-4300M is quite a bit slower than the Core i3-12100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-4300M
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 37 vs 58 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i3-12100F
- Up to 49% faster in Battlefield 6 – 97 vs 65 FPS
- Up to 49% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer – Jan 13, 2022 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-4300M vs Core i3-12100F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4300M vs Core i3-12100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4300M vs Core i3-12100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4300M
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
84%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-12100F
Jan 13th, 2022
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4300M Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-12100F Jan 13th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Jan 13th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $97.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
37 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 5000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
