Buy on Amazon
€164.13
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP $199
Availability
MSRP $199
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms Core i5-4250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3136 days newer than Core i5-4250U.
Advantages of Core i5-4250U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400 - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 29% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-4250U - 238 vs 184 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4250U - 12 vs 4 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i5-12400
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
238
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€164.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
CPU CORE I5-12400 S1700 Box/2.5G BX8071512400 S RL4V IN
Buy for €164.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i5-4250U
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2013
Core i5-12400
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-4250U | vs | Core i5-12400 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 13.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Intel HD 5000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
PCs Using Core i5-4250U or Core i5-12400
With selected game settings
100 FPS
€8.75/FPS
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€875
In Stock
100 FPS
€7.5/FPS
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€749.9
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
