Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 3443 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470T.
Advantages of Core i5-3470T
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - €267.60 vs €434.79
- Up to 31% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-12900K - €1.16 vs €1.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-3470T - 259 vs 231 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470T - 24 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
231
89%
Value, €/FPS
€1.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€267.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €267.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
259
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.68/FPS
69%
Price, €
€434.79
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for €434.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3470T | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |