Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Core i5-3380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 1393 days newer than Core i5-3380M.
Advantages of Core i5-3380M
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 35 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 21% better in Dead Island 2 than Core i5-3380M - 144 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3380M - 44 vs 4 threads
Dead Island 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3380M
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3380M | vs | Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 22 |
| 4 | Threads | 44 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 145 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
