Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Core i5-3380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3655 days newer than Core i5-3380M.
Advantages of Core i5-3380M
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 35 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 31% better in Battlefield IV than Core i5-3380M - 490 vs 374 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3380M - 32 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
490
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€719.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €719.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 432 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3380M | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |