Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 3588 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Core i5-2400S
- Up to 46% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5900X - €129.98 vs €242.21
- Up to 35% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 9 5900X - €0.77 vs €1.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 21% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-2400S - 203 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 24 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
168
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
100%
Price, €
€129.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €129.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Buy for €242.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-2400S | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |