Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-14400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-14400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 369 days older than the cheaper Core i5-14400F.
Advantages of Core i5-14400F
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - €159.99 vs €494.99
- Up to 67% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-13900 - €0.73 vs €2.19 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 4% better in Valheim than Core i5-14400F - 226 vs 218 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400F - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
218
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€159.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €159.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 292 minutes ago
Buy for €494.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 292 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-14400F | vs | Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |