Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-14400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-14400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700 is 369 days older than the cheaper Core i5-14400F.
Advantages of Core i5-14400F
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i7-13700 - €167.00 vs €388.52
- Up to 56% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-13700 - €1.27 vs €2.88 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-13700
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-14400F - 135 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400F - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
132
98%
Value, €/FPS
€1.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€167
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €167 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
Buy for €388.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-14400F | vs | Core i7-13700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |