Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-14400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-14400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 468 days older than the cheaper Core i5-14400F.
Advantages of Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 9% better in Starfield than Core i5-14400F - 81 vs 74 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400F - 20 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i5-14400F
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - €176.22 vs €259.56
- Up to 26% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-13600KF - €2.38 vs €3.20 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
81
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.2/FPS
74%
Price, €
€259.56
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for €259.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 252 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
74
91%
Value, €/FPS
€2.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€176.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €176.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 251 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-13600KF | vs | Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |