Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 266 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12400F.
Advantages of Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 22% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i5-12400F - 177 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i5-12400F
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - €148.74 vs €270.35
- Up to 33% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i5-13600KF - €1.03 vs €1.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
177
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.53/FPS
67%
Price, €
€270.35
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for €270.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 263 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
145
82%
Value, €/FPS
€1.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€148.74
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €148.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 263 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-13600KF | vs | Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |