Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 16% better in Battlefield IV than Core i5-10400F - 481 vs 416 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i5-10400F
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - €200.00 vs €280.00
- Up to 17% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i5-13600KF - €0.48 vs €0.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €280 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 580 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
416
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€200
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 581 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-13600KF | vs | Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |