Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13600K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13600K is 880 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 11% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-10700F - 185 vs 166 FPS
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - €222.60 vs €317.32
- Up to 37% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-10700F - €1.20 vs €1.91 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-10700F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
185
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€222.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €222.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4618 minutes ago
Buy for €317.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4619 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-13600K | vs | Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |