Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-12100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-12100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 245 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-12100F.
Advantages of Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 2% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-12100F - 167 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - €81.33 vs €301.54
- Up to 72% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-13600K - €0.50 vs €1.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 58 vs 125 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.81/FPS
28%
Price, €
€301.54
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for €301.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
164
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.33
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-13600K | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 58 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |