Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 369 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-13400F.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - €157.00 vs €607.71
- Up to 68% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i9-14900 - €0.98 vs €3.10 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 22% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-13400F - 196 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
161
82%
Value, €/FPS
€0.98/FPS
100%
Price, €
€157
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €157 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Buy for €607.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-13400F | vs | Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |