Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 365 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12400F.
Advantages of Core i5-12400F
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €133.09 vs €495.99
- Up to 69% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-13900F - €0.28 vs €0.90 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 16% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-12400F - 551 vs 474 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 32 vs 12 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
474
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€133.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €133.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162 minutes ago
Buy for €495.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-12400F | vs | Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |