Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700K is 651 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12400F.
Advantages of Core i5-12400F
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i7-14700K - €133.09 vs €414.00
- Up to 66% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-14700K - €0.94 vs €2.76 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-14700K
- Performs up to 6% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-12400F - 150 vs 142 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 28 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
142
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.94/FPS
100%
Price, €
€133.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €133.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6944 minutes ago
Buy for €414 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6944 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-12400F | vs | Core i7-14700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 20 |
12 | Threads | 28 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |