Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 266 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12400F.
Advantages of Core i5-12400F
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - €133.09 vs €222.60
- Up to 40% better value when playing Stray than Core i5-13600K - €0.71 vs €1.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than Core i5-12400F - 189 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
188
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€133.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €133.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6927 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
189
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.18/FPS
60%
Price, €
€222.6
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for €222.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6927 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-12400F | vs | Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 14 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |