Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F and the cheaper Core i5-12400 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - €168.57 vs €444.28
- Up to 60% better value when playing Valorant than Core i9-12900F - €0.19 vs €0.48 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Valorant than Core i5-12400 - 921 vs 870 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 24 vs 12 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
870
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€168.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €168.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 984 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
921
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
40%
Price, €
€444.28
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for €444.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 983 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-12400 | vs | Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |