Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 1028 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11400F.
Advantages of Core i5-11400F
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - €154.49 vs €176.22
- Up to 8% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-14400F - €0.88 vs €0.96 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 4% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-11400F - 183 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 16 vs 12 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
176
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.88/FPS
100%
Price, €
€154.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €154.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 571 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
183
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.96/FPS
92%
Price, €
€176.22
87%
FPS Winner
Buy for €176.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 570 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-11400F | vs | Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |