In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-11300H is slightly slower than the Core i9-10900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-11300H
- Is 1 year and 2 months newer – Jan 11, 2021 vs Oct 19, 2019
- Is 1 year and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 83% less energy – 28 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 83% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10900X
- Up to 4% faster in Battlefield 6 – 85 vs 82 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-11300H vs Core i9-10900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
85 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
100%
Price, $
$449.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.29/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-11300H vs Core i9-10900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-11300H vs Core i9-10900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-11300H
Jan 11th, 2021
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
42%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
94%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-11300H Jan 11th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900X Oct 19th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 11th, 2021 | Released | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| $309.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | LGA2066 |
28 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR4 |
Iris XE 80EU | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
