Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600KF.
Advantages of Core i5-10600KF
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - €129.60 vs €612.36
- Up to 76% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i9-14900F - €0.18 vs €0.75 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 11% better in Rocket League than Core i5-10600KF - 812 vs 731 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 32 vs 12 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
731
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€129.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €129.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 235 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
812
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
24%
Price, €
€612.36
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €612.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 234 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10600KF | vs | Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |