In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-10600K is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-14900. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $392 cheaper!
Core i5-10600K
- Up to 69% cheaper – $177.99 vs $569.99
- Up to 69% cheaper
- Up to 52% better value in Battlefield 6 – $2.11 vs $4.41/FPS
- Up to 52% better value in Battlefield 6
Core i9-14900
- Up to 54% faster in Battlefield 6 – 129 vs 84 FPS
- Up to 54% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-10600K vs Core i9-14900: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-10600K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
84 FPS
65%
Min 1% FPS
63 FPS
65%
Price, $
$177.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.11/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
129 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
97 FPS
100%
Price, $
$569.99
31%
Value, $/FPS
$4.41/FPS
48%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10600K vs Core i9-14900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10600K vs Core i9-14900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10600K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
83%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i9-14900
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
49%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10600K Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $549.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
