In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-10600K is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-12900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-10600K
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-12900F
- Up to 40% faster in Battlefield 6 – 116 vs 83 FPS
- Up to 40% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 1 year and 8 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 1 year and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-10600K vs Core i9-12900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-10600K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
83 FPS
72%
Min 1% FPS
62 FPS
71%
Price, $
$177.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.14/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10600K vs Core i9-12900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10600K vs Core i9-12900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10600K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
38%
L3 Cache
12 MB
40%
Base Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
94%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
56%
Core i9-12900F
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10600K Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900F Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $494.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
