Buy on Amazon
€200
In Stock
Prices and Stock
Prices and Stock
Prices and StockMSRP $699
Prices and Stock
MSRP $699
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 987 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Core i5-10400F
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €200.00 vs €630.99
- Up to 37% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-13900KS - €3.77 vs €5.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 100% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-10400F - 106 vs 53 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-10400F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
53
50%
Value, €/FPS
€3.77/FPS
100%
Price, €
€200
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-10400F 2.9GHz LGA1200 Box
Buy for €200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 291 minutes ago
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
106
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.95/FPS
63%
Price, €
€630.99
31%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-13900KS - Processore desktop a 24 core (8 P + 16 E), 36 MB di cache, fino a 6,0 GHz
Buy for €630.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 295 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-10400F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10400F | vs | Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 24 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Core i5-10400F or Core i9-13900KS
With selected game settings
Popular Core i5-10400F and Core i9-13900KS Comparisons
Compare 2 Processors in Games
Core i9-13900KS
€630.99
vs
Ryzen 7 5700X
€176.99
Core i9-13900KS
€630.99
vs
Ryzen 5 7600X
€228.99
Core i9-13900KS
€630.99
vs
Ryzen 5 5600X
€125.77
Core i9-13900KS
€630.99
vs
Ryzen 5 7600
€218.09
Core i9-13900KS
€630.99
vs
Core i7-12700KF
€247.68
Core i9-13900KS
€630.99
vs
Ryzen 7 5800X
€161.49
Core i9-13900KS
€630.99
vs
Ryzen 7 5700X3D
€249
Core i9-13900KS
€630.99
vs
Core i7-12700K
€255.99
Core i9-13900KS
€630.99
vs
Ryzen 7 5700
€158.77
Core i9-13900KS
€630.99
vs
Ryzen 5 5600
€166.05
Core i5-10400F
€200
vs
Core i9-13900K
€533
Core i5-10400F
€200
vs
Ryzen 9 7900X3D
€681.14
Core i5-10400F
€200
vs
Core i9-10900KF
€599
Core i5-10400F
€200
vs
Core i9-14900F
€612.36
Core i5-10400F
€200
vs
Core i9-10850K
€541.71
Core i5-10400F
€200
vs
Core i9-14900
€641.35
Core i5-10400F
€200
vs
Core i9-13900KF
€544.29
Core i5-10400F
€200
vs
Core i9-10900
€635
Core i5-10400F
€200
vs
Core i7-7820X
€641.79
Core i5-10400F
€200
vs
Core i7-3820
€592.22