Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Core i5-10400F
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - €200.00 vs €480.04
- Up to 52% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i9-13900KF - €0.68 vs €1.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 14% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-10400F - 336 vs 295 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 32 vs 12 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
295
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€200
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
336
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.43/FPS
48%
Price, €
€480.04
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for €480.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10400F | vs | Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |