Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700K is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Core i5-10400F
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i7-11700K - €200.00 vs €484.32
- Up to 47% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-11700K - €0.54 vs €1.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-11700K
- Performs up to 30% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-10400F - 478 vs 369 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
369
77%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€200
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
478
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.01/FPS
53%
Price, €
€484.32
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for €484.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10400F | vs | Core i7-11700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |