Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Core i3-9100T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1242 days newer than Core i3-9100T.
Advantages of Core i3-9100T
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 35 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-9100T - 205 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
205
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€87.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €87.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7529 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-9100T | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |