In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-7350K is slower than the Ryzen 9 3950X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-7350K
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 60 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 43% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 9 3950X
- Up to 20% faster in Battlefield 6 – 89 vs 74 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 2 years and 10 months newer – Nov 25, 2019 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 2 years and 10 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-7350K vs Ryzen 9 3950X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7350K vs Ryzen 9 3950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7350K vs Ryzen 9 3950X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7350K
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
4 MB
6%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
75%
Ryzen 9 3950X
Nov 25th, 2019
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7350K Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 3950X Nov 25th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $749.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM4 |
60W | Power Consumption | 105W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
