Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Core i3-7100T
- Up to 81% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €146.85 vs €779.26
- Up to 78% better value when playing Deathloop than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €0.84 vs €3.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 35 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 16% better in Deathloop than Core i3-7100T - 202 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 32 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
174
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€146.85
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €146.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
202
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.86/FPS
22%
Price, €
€779.26
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for €779.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-7100T | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |