The Core i3-7100T is a much slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G, it's also the same value for money, as it's only €46.63 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i3-7100T
- Up to 30% cheaper – €106.68 vs €153.31
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 4 threads
Core i3-7100T vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
180
95%
Min 1% FPS
120
96%
Price, €
€106.68
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
Jul 21st, 2020
Average FPS
189
100%
Min 1% FPS
125
100%
Price, €
€153.31
69%
Value, €/FPS
€0.81/FPS
73%
Core i3-7100T vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100T vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100T vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
75%
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
Jul 21st, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.701 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-7100T | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Renoir |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 GHz |
3 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
No | Overclockable | No |