In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-7100T is slower than the Core i9-10850K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-7100T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i9-10850K
- Up to 33% faster in Battlefield 6 – 89 vs 67 FPS
- Up to 33% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 6 months newer – Jul 27, 2020 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 3 years and 6 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100T vs Core i9-10850K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
67 FPS
75%
Min 1% FPS
50 FPS
75%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i9-10850K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i9-10850K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
3 MB
15%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
82%
Core i9-10850K
Jul 27th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10850K Jul 27th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jul 27th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
