Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Core i3-7100
- Up to 76% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - €122.66 vs €520.00
- Up to 74% better value when playing World of Tanks than Ryzen 9 7950X - €0.23 vs €0.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 51 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 12% better in World of Tanks than Core i3-7100 - 590 vs 528 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 32 vs 4 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
528
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€122.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €122.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 258 minutes ago
Buy for €520 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 265 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-7100 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |