Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms Core i3-6320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 2968 days newer than Core i3-6320.
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 73% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-6320 - 605 vs 349 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6320 - 32 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
605
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.78/FPS
100%
Price, €
€471.07
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €471.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-6320 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |