Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 709 days older than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 1% better in Dirt 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 170 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 32 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
170
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€129.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €129.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 357 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-6100 | vs | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |