Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms the more expensive Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 4646 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-540.
Advantages of Core i3-540
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600X - 73 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 25% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-540 - 138 vs 110 FPS
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i3-540 - €219.00 vs €298.00
- Up to 41% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i3-540 - €1.59 vs €2.71 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-540 - 12 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €298 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
138
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€219
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €219 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-540 | vs | Ryzen 5 7600X |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |