The Core i3-530 is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-3820 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's €5.86 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i3-530
- Consumes up to 44% less energy – 73 vs 130 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i7-3820 cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Advantages of the Core i7-3820
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 10% cheaper – €50.54 vs €56.40
- A better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Core i3-530 vs Core i7-3820 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-3820
Feb 13th, 2012
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
114
100%
Price, €
€50.54
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Core i3-530 vs Core i7-3820 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-530 vs Core i7-3820 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-530 vs Core i7-3820 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-530
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
40%
Base Frequency
2.93 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
83%
Core i7-3820
Feb 13th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
10 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-530 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-3820 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
$113.00 | MSRP | $305.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
73 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
Performance | ||
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
4 MB | L3 Cache | 10 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1333 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1600 MHz |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | Yes |