Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Core i3-5015U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 2076 days newer than Core i3-5015U.
Advantages of Core i3-5015U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 15 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 77% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-5015U - 474 vs 268 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-5015U - 32 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
474
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€314
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €314 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 256 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-5015U | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell-U | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 5500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |