Core i3-4160T vs Core i5-13400F in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Core i3-4160T is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-13400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i5-13400F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i3-4160T
Jul 21st, 2014
Average FPS
192
86%
Min 1% FPS
132
86%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
224
100%
Min 1% FPS
153
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i5-13400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i5-13400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160T
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
3 MB
15%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4160T | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $196.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
