The Core i3-4160 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-13900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-4160
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Core i9-13900
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 4 threads
Core i3-4160 vs Core i9-13900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-4160
Jul 21st, 2014
Average FPS
179
83%
Min 1% FPS
119
84%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
215
100%
Min 1% FPS
141
100%
Price, €
€494.99
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.3/FPS
100%
Core i3-4160 vs Core i9-13900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160 vs Core i9-13900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160 vs Core i9-13900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
56%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-4160 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-13900 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $549.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
54 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 5.6 GHz |
| 3 MB | L3 Cache | 36 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
