Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms Core i3-390M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 4279 days newer than Core i3-390M.
Advantages of Core i3-390M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 15% better in Dead Space than Core i3-390M - 165 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-390M - 24 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
165
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€365.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €365.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-390M | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Arrandale | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |