Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8700G is 4822 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 8700G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 7 8700G
- Performs up to 31% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-380M - 478 vs 365 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-380M doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
478
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€302.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €302.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7139 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-380M | vs | Ryzen 7 8700G |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Arrandale | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
No | Overclockable | Yes |