Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 4739 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 14% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-380M - 168 vs 147 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-380M doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
168
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.8/FPS
100%
Price, €
€471.07
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €471.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-380M | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Arrandale | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |