Core i3-350M vs Core i7-11700F in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Core i3-350M is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-11700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-350M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i7-11700F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i3-350M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
178
81%
Min 1% FPS
124
83%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-11700F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
219
100%
Min 1% FPS
150
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-350M vs Core i7-11700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-350M vs Core i7-11700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-350M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
2.267 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-11700F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-350M | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-11700F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $298.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
