Core i3-3120M vs Core i9-12900F in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Core i3-3120M is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-12900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-3120M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i9-12900F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 24 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i3-3120M
Sep 30th, 2012
Average FPS
180
78%
Min 1% FPS
125
80%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-12900F
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
230
100%
Min 1% FPS
156
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3120M vs Core i9-12900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3120M vs Core i9-12900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3120M
Sep 30th, 2012
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-12900F
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3120M | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 30th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $494.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
