In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-2367M is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-10900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-2367M
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 17 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 74% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10900F
- Up to 40% faster in Battlefield 6 – 88 vs 63 FPS
- Up to 40% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Oct 01, 2011
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-2367M vs Core i9-10900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-2367M vs Core i9-10900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-2367M vs Core i9-10900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-2367M
Oct 1st, 2011
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
3 MB
15%
Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
50%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-2367M Oct 1st, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 1st, 2011 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $464.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1200 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
