Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Core i3-2367M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3769 days newer than Core i3-2367M.
Advantages of Core i3-2367M
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 17 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 320% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i3-2367M - 147 vs 35 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2367M - 8 vs 4 threads
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
147
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.33
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €81.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Oct 1st, 2011
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-2367M | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Oct 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |