In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-2310M is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-2310M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
- Up to 35% faster in Battlefield 6 – 84 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 35% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer – Jul 21, 2020 vs Feb 01, 2011
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-2310M vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
Jul 21st, 2020
Average FPS
84 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
63 FPS
100%
Price, $
$998
100%
Value, $/FPS
$11.88/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-2310M vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-2310M vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-2310M
Feb 1st, 2011
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
58%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
Jul 21st, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-2310M Feb 1st, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G Jul 21st, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 1st, 2011 | Released | Jul 21st, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AM4 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
