Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-13100 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 7 3700X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-13100 is 1277 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 7 3700X.
Advantages of Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 9% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 7 3700X - 148 vs 136 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - €139.95 vs €140.78
- Up to 9% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 7 3700X - €0.95 vs €1.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 60 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100 - 16 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
148
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.95/FPS
100%
Price, €
€139.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €139.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7109 minutes ago
Buy for €140.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7109 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-13100 | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |